Skip to main content

Making the Jehovah's Witness Cry Uncle -- Writer's Poke #178

Every week he would come over for an hour, and we would work through one of the Watchtower publications. We did this my entire senior year in high school.

These sessions were interesting to me, but I was never converted.

In a Watchtower publication, you read through an "argument" that's always heavily documented with Bible verses. Then at the end of the article, you're asked to review questions that direct you back to the verses you've read, or to points made in the article's argument.

I found this frustrating, as there was no incentive to think outside of scripture, or beyond what the article said. For example, one article talked about the idea of the Watchmaker. I didn't know that this metaphor had actually been around for 200 years. And unfortunately at that time I didn't know that Richard Dawkins had recently written an entire book refuting the idea. All I knew was that according to the article, I was supposed to see the logic that humans must have a Creator, just as a watch must have a maker.

It wasn't that I was against the idea of God. In fact, I believed in God. What I didn't believe in was being force-fed a specific way of thinking.

After a year, I wore out my teacher. "We're just not making progress," he told me. "I don't feel that you're ready to believe, and I cannot justify spending more time on you when there are other people out there ready to listen."

This year taught me a lot about religion and belief. It also taught me that my brain couldn't be washed.

What do you believe? Are you willing to carefully analyze your beliefs? And if so, have you? Would you even know how to begin a real analysis?

"Belief means not wanting to know what is true." Frederich Nietzsche

Comments

  1. As I can't accept Evolution, can you point me somewhere else please. I would like to know how it all came about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I appreciate your thoughts and agree about thinking outside the square. Can you point me to some another explanation as to how we and the Universe got here?
    Please not to Evolution as that is inside the square and not proven in anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi ya, Nick. I no more believe everything Dawkins writes than I do what non-Evolutionists write.

    From the standpoint of physics, I think it's pretty interesting to consider the idea that the Universe has always been around. That is, matter always has been -- it just changes form. To me, that's the ultimate idea of "evolution," but it's not "evolution" per se.

    My personal views aside, though... I'm just a student. I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I don't pretend to be an authority that can lead you. If you haven't read the Tao Te Ching, though, you should. It won't give you the meaning of life, but I think you might like it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...