At last night's Obama /Clinton debate, Clinton closed strong on a positive note. Not surprisingly, that's what the pundits focused on. "Clinton showed her true side at the end." "Clinton displayed her humanness." "That was the real Hillary." Interesting. Does that mean that for the other 95% of the debate, Hillary was "false," "inhuman," and "fake"? Meanwhile, Barack spent most of the debate purposefully staying on the high road. He remained positive for at least 95% of the debate. So why give Hillary credit for 5% when Barack was doing exactly the same thing for 95%?
The Blog of Bret R. Fuller