The Writer's Poke

As the ending credits begin, we're told that A Simple Twist of Fate was "suggested by the George Eliot's Silas Marner," a Victorian novel written in 1861. The movie was written by Steve Martin, and he also served as the Executive Producer. As far as I can tell, it was a box-office flop. It grossed just $3 million during its limited engagement run, and production cost certainly ran somewhere around $10 million.  No one, in other words, was clamoring for modernized retelling of Silas Marner.  Well, it's been 30 years, but I have actually read that novel, and when I decided to watch this film, it was just because I'm watching Steve Martin movies this year, and I had no idea that the movie had a Silas Marner connection.  Martin studied philosophy in college, and he does seem to have a passion for the classics, including Edmond Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac and William Shakespeare's Hamlet, etc.  All that's well and good, but how does this one work as a ...

Amir (Khalid Abdalla) learns a secret about his father after his father (Baba) is dead. Basically, even the best people are hypocrites. They believe one thing and do another. Baba wasn't a fanatic, but the film also shows how even the "most religious" people will base their beliefs on "God's Word," and then follow or enforce those beliefs selectively.  I thought about this during the "halftime show" that Amir watches as an adult. The Taliban bring out a couple found guilty of adultery. The penalty, the leader says, is death by stoning. It's the punishment God requires. And so, they carry out the punishment on the woman, stoning her to death. The man is right there next to her, but we never see them carry out the punishment on him. I'm guessing they let him live. Maybe they thought it was punishment enough being brought out in front of the crowd and shamed (not to mention having his lover killed without being able to do anything about it). I...

Roman Polanski speaks five languages -- Polish, French, English, Spanish, and Russian -- and this is the first film he directed in English. In an interview included on the Criterion DVD, he said that for him, characters matter more than the story, because you will remember the characters long after you forget what the story and the plot elements were. And at least in the case of this movie, that's probably absolutely true. We are definitely going to remember Catherine Deneuve's performance, even if we never definitely learn why the character, Carol, is as she is.  The film opens with the close-up on a human eye -- Carol's (Catherine Deneuve) eye. The names of the movie's cast and crew come and go, but the eye continues to take up the background of the screen. Who is Carol? She's a young blonde French hairdresser living in London. She lives with her older sister, who is having an affair with a married man. Carol doesn't seem to like him much. He puts his toothbru...

The theatrical version, A Short Film about Killing (1989) is about 24 minutes longer than this version. Interestingly, all additional 24 minutes take place before Jacek murders the Taxi Driver. This made me wonder: Why did Kieslowski add all the additional content to the front end of the film? The last 25 minutes of each version is basically the same. What could have been added to that section? And that got me thinking about all of the stuff that was left out or not fully explained in this version (as well as, for the most part, the other version). For example, only Piotr (Krzysztof Globisz) visits Jacek in prison. None of Jacek's family -- his brothers and mother -- visit him as he waits for his death sentence to be carried out.  We also learn about a few things by dialogue only. For example, Piotr mentions than he was in the same coffeehouse right before Jacek committed the murder. In the extended version, we actually get to see them in the coffeeshop at the same time.  Piot...

Dorota (Krystyna Janda) is mean and nobody likes her. Actually, her husband likes her. He thinks they're having a baby. Her lover also likes her. He tells her so on the phone, but she's already put the phone down and doesn't hear him. When I asked my Humanities students if they felt empathy or judgement for Dorota and the Doctor, it was unanimous. They all felt empathy for the Doctor, but they also felt judgement for Dorota. Maybe I shouldn't have presented the question as either/or. Maybe we can feel both at the same time, just as Dorota tells the Doctor that it's possible to love two men at the same time.  Actually, the class didn't have much time to discuss and think about the question. If they had had more time, I bet more students would start to feel empathetic. Dorota really wants to be a mother, for example. Anyone would be empathetic for that. She's even willing to sacrifice that want if her husband lives. The judgement comes in, of course, because s...

The one scene I appreciated was when Roger (Steve Martin) needs to win a big case, but he's prepped so much that he falls asleep in the courtroom. Edwina (Lily Tomlin) has died and somehow her spirit has entered his body. She tries to wake up "her other half," but when Roger won't wake up, she takes over and pretends, badly, to be Roger, and she almost wins the case -- until Roger does wake up, and she learns that the reasons for winning would be lie... forcing the case to be lost. Why did Edwina's spirit enter Roger's body? That was an accident. There was always another vessel in mind. But suspend your need to know how and why things happen in this film. Just focus on this: Is it funny? Does the movie hold up? I don't think so. It never kept my attention, really. Martin is in his "The Jerk" mode (just slightly muted). Tomlin is fine, but the only way we can see her spirit is when Martin looks in a mirror. I know this is just a cute way of lettin...

Ben Stiller makes a very believable 16-year-old nerd. Cameron Diaz, too, can pass as the pretty popular high school girl. I found that I really liked the opening set-up more than most of what followed. Sometimes I find myself writing a different movie than the one written. It's a bad habit, I guess, but that opening segment was so good, I just found myself a little disappointed when it then jumped ahead 13 years to the present. The movie as written: Ted (Stiller) is a nerd, but for whatever reason, the pretty girl, Mary (Diaz), likes him. She is the one who actually invites him to Prom. Stiller's smile, mouthful of braces, is so sweet. He looks like Charlie Brown got asked to the Prom by the Little Redheaded girl. Unfortunately, they never make it to Prom. A ridiculous series of events in the bathroom lands Ted in the hospital, and Mary moves away. That's odd. As nice and as considerate as Mary is, she doesn't visit Ted in the hospital, and she never contacts him again....