The Writer's Poke

The most important thing: Does Buchanan (Randolph Scott) leave town with his money? It's funny, because he does get the money from the Sherriff's safe, but it's $250 short. But as far as I can tell, he leaves town with $1750 plus Juan's (Manuel Rojas) amazing horse. Thus, his plan to buy a stake in west Texas is intact.  While Buchanan may ride alone, he does need the help of some friends to avoid hanging. At first, he's just a stranger in town, and since they know he has money, when he's in the wrong place at the wrong time, it seems like the Sheriff decides it's easy to hang him and steal his money. The Sheriff's brother, however, makes sure that Buchanan receives a trial, and Buchanan is found not guilty. Nevertheless, the Sheriff has no intention of giving back the money and sends two men to ride Buchanan out of town. The plan is for them to shoot Buchanan.  However, Buchanan and Pecos (L.Q. Jones) discover that they're both Texas men with the sa...

One way to describe the Ranown Westerns? Minimalist. In a user review for The Tall T, someone wrote that the characters weren't developed enough. I'm not sure I agree. What's definitely true is that both The Tall T and Decision at Sundown focus on a moment in time. These are not stories that tell us much about the moment before, and they may leave us uncertain about the moment after. All we get is the Now. Sundown is the name of the town. The name itself should tell us something. Consider a town that is named Sundown as opposed to Sunrise. Sundown is somehow more foreboding. The "now" of the moment is the Tate Kimbrough (John Carroll) wedding. Even though he's been with Ruby (Valerie French), even right up to before the wedding ceremony apparently, he's marrying Lucy (Karen Steele). Why? Because Ruby isn't the marrying kind. She's lowkey made out to be a "salon worker" and all that entails. Why would Lucy put up with this? Ruby even plans...

I came to the Ranown Westerns with no knowledge of who Randolph Scott and Budd Boetticher were. I love Westerns, and I've watched about 100 John Wayne films, but beyond that, I haven't studied the genre. Thanks to Letterboxd, I also know that I haven't been watching very many Westerns in 2025-26 -- it's the genre right at the bottom of my list. But I picked up the Ronown Westerns 5-film Criterion collection during the last sale, and I'm now ready to dive in. First impressions: 1. These films are at the tail-end of Scott's career. He did around 100 films, but here he's 59 years old and probably doing his last 10 or so films. He does look a bit old, and I would assume that the parts are really meant for someone younger. His age isn't a big issue. It's just something I thought about. 2. B-Movies. So, the Ranown Westerns are supposed to be B-movies -- the "cheaper" films slapped onto a double-bill. What makes these films B-quality? The run-time...

Yes, as other reviewers have said, it does have its moments, and sure, if you were reviewing individual segments, maybe you would rate some of them better than other. Unfortunately, this isn't SCTV, and the movie has to be rated as a unified whole. In some respects, Going Berserk is a loose parody of The Manchurian Candidate (1963). John (John Candy) is a fat chauffer driver who is preparing to marry the Congressman's daughter, Nancy (Alley Mills). The Congressman has a developed an enemy in the Cult Leader Rev. Sun Yi Day (Richard Libertini). Day and his group plan to hypnotize John and have him kill the Congressmen at the wedding ceremony. Along the way, the movie happens. Much of it has little to do with the plot I've just described. Some of it is funny; much of it is weird. This is Candy's first starring role in a movie. I read that he had zero acting training prior to this movie, but his acting isn't the issue here. He's a fine comedic actor. The problem is...

Writer and Executive Producer: John Hughes (but not Director for this one). It's funny that Hughes uses his real name for his "top-tier" stuff, but uses the pen name, Edmond Dantes, for stuff he wrote that he doesn't want to be connected with. Why didn't he use Dantes for this screenplay? Seems like a good simple premise. Put John Candy and his family and the uninvited guests, Dan Akroyd and his family, in the Great Northern Forests, and see what happens. Chet (Candy) plays a kind of E.B. White "father." He remembers going up North as a kid, and he wants to give his kid the same fond memories he had. Roman (Akroyd) doesn't have a love of nature. He looks out at the great expanse of undeveloped land, and he sees dollars signs -- tree mills, mining, and places to dump toxic waste. As you would expect, there's comedic conflict between the two families, and then they come together and discover the real meaning of family. Buck (Chris Young) also gets ...

In my search for films with Charles Grodin with good ratings, I stumbled upon this one. For whatever reason, I have a difficult time finding 1970s films that I want to watch. Why is that? I mean, I have no problems finding films from any other decade, but beyond the "best well known" films of the 1970s, I tend to draw a blank.  And this one, I would have thought, would be better known. It was nominated for 14 Oscars and won 9. But nope. I went in to watching it without having a clue what the plot was about. Nor did I know that this is a remake of Here Comes Mr. Jordan (1941), which features another one of my favorite actors, Claude Rains. (There's also a 1943 movie called Heaven Can Wait, but it has nothing to do with the 1978 version.) Although I'm okay with fantasy, the premise of the film is a little absurd. I could forgive that, but I don't like how the ending is handled. In brief, Joe (Warren Beatty) is a back-up quarterback for the Los Angeles Rams. He's...