Almost unwatchable. At least that's how I felt as I tried to watch this. And so, I go immediately to user reviews to see what the heck I'm missing, because a 2- or 3-star review should give me more insight into what I'm missing here. 2 or 3 stars should say, "Hey, this movie isn't that good, but it does have X going for it." I think the main X is just that it's a Randolph Scott flick, and so we give it an extra star for that, and maybe because an early Ann Sheridan is in it, too. That's not enough for me. Another reviewer did note the striking "Walter Brennan-like" acting ability of Charles 'Chic' Sale, who plays the Sheriff. And I would agree. He probably is my favorite character in the story. Otherwise, I had absolutely no interest in the story. Sadly, it's one of my least favorite movies for the entire year (of the 230 or so films that I've watched so far in 2026).
After watching a couple of his 1930s films, I can confirm that Randolph Scott is much more "recognizable" as his more mature self in this 1940s film. I like the way everything in this story is split in two: Farmers vs. Cowboys is the main division, but the town is also divided. On one side, it's the church and businesses (civilization) on one side of the street, and the saloons on the other side. Dan (Scott) is the town marshal. This gives him the obligation to patrol both sides. He also has a counterpart: Sheriff Trimble (Edgar Buchanan), representing the law for the county. Dan takes his job seriously. The Sheriff would rather play cards and stay out of trouble. We have the two love interests: Sherry (Rhoda Fleming) on the church side, and Rita (Ann Dvorak) on the saloon side. Dan likes both of them, and they both like him. But Dan has a little more "saloon side" in him. He wants to represent the good guys, but he's willing to use his gun. He's also ...