The Writer's Poke

Flow looks unlike any other animated film I've ever seen. That's what ultimately pushes the rating up to 5/5 for me. I think it is subtle storytelling, and for a while, I was holding back a bit in my praise. The ending itself it pretty quiet, too, but I appreciated how it ended... This might be odd to say, but I felt like the animation of the background and everything OTHER THAN the animals was amazing. I'm not sure what I think about the animals themselves. They looked "weird" and somehow a little off. Not the Cat itself, but maybe just the dogs. I don't know. I don't want to make a big deal about it. What's maybe surprising is that this is a world where people obviously existed, but I thought for sure the animals would need to run across some people eventually... maybe by the end, say. But nope. No people. They are all gone. Just some cat statues, a drawing, some boats, and whatever nick-nacks lemurs collect. But what happened to all of the people? W...

When the movie starts, the animation feels very two-dimensional. It's "layered," and the animation follows simple rules of perspective, but it's still very two-dimensional. As I watched the film, either the animation changed, or I adopted to the style. Maybe both. The story itself is a little odd, with some things not really explained. For example, Maleficent isn't invited. Is the King and Queen really shocked when she shows up anyway? She has her own kingdom, right next door, I gather, but she rules over pigs and other cartoon characters, and that made me wonder why evil is represented so "cartoony." Maleficent is represented as pure evil, and I guess that means she doesn't need a reason to be evil, but I still want to know: Why is she so evil? Did she curse Aurora simply for not being invited to the party? Because she was beautiful? I don't really understand the motive. I was also confused about why Auroa's three fairy godmothers apparently...

Based on the reviews I've read, I'm not the only one who likes to watch all of the available versions of classic novel adaptations. This is the 5th version of Jane Eyre that I've watched recently, and although I was curious about this one, I definitely had low expectation. Why? I guess I thought George C. Scott was a real stretch to play Rochester, especially since this film came right after his portrayal of Patton, and I had a hard time imaging Patton playing Rochester. In addition to that, although I'm not familiar with Susannah York, I knew she was in her 30s, and Jane Eyre should be played by someone a decade younger. But I started watching, and the movie won me over. In fact, I was generally pleasantly surprised with the acting, the pacing, and the setting. Everything "clicked" for me. After reading various reviews, I learned that the video quality would probably stink, and that was certainly the case for the DVD version I bought. The color was very incon...

The lighting and shading in this movie are amazing. Great use of colors. I watched this movie as a kind of modern-day fairy tale, with Claire Danes playing the role of a modern-day Cinderella... Mirabelle (Claire Danes) and Jeremy (Jason Swartzman) are both in their mid-twenties. Ray (Steve Martin) is in his 50s. A weird Mirabelle love triangle develops. Mirabelle has nothing in common with Jeremy, and she's way too young for Ray, but he is also the man of her "dreams," in terms of a man who has the means and the experience she's looking for to make her feel seen and important. I think we're supposed to feel uncomfortable about the age difference. Ray even comments at the first date that he hopes she has a good relationship with her father, so he's uncomfortable by the age difference. too. Ray's house is immaculately clean. And sterile. It feels empty and unlived in. When he gives Mirabelle the tour, everything is in its place. He saves the bedroom for las...

Pretty nice retrospective of Garbo's life and career made 15 years after her death in 2005 by TCM. Kind of wish they had made it during her lifetime, because as is, the people alive that still knew her were pretty old, and many of the people interviewed are just the children or grandchildren of those who knew her. The other thing: She retired at 36 and apparently completely disappeared from public life. So as the documentary notes, not much is known about her life after her career. She walked. She had a friend that she walked with and who acted as her confidant, but she lived in America, which means she was completely cutoff from any family. She never had children, and I guess never married. This is never explored. Did she completely give up dating, too, when she "retired." Did she stop going back to visit Sweden? Although it would be easy to call her a hermit or a recluse, the idea presented in the documentary is that she simply liked being alone. Her last film, 1941...

The scene that stands out to me most is when Queen Christina (Greta Garbo) is dressed as a man and has secured the last room in the Inn. Antonio (John Gilbert), the Spanish ambassador, needs a room too. He's willing to share it with the "young man" he assumes Queen Christina to be. She tries to give him the room, but in the end, they do end up sharing it, and once she removes her hat and coat, he discovers she's all woman. It's funny how Garbo has eyelashes and make-up, breasts, and yet, she was able to fool everyone into thinking she was just a young man who couldn't yet grow a mustache... The canapé bed has curtains, and so we assume that she and Antonio spend three full days in bed together during the snowstorm. That's pretty racy, but the curtains always remain closed. Even when the innkeeper comes in to offer them both chocolate, Antonio's is the only voice we hear invisibly respond. So we let ourselves logically imagine that both are in bed toget...

Interesting to pair this one with a reading or viewing of 1984, which I've been studying and teaching to students at the time I watched this one.  It's frustrating watching Ninotchka (Greta Garbo) for the first 50 minutes of the film. She's so monotone, so lifeless, so robotic. This is all on purpose, of course, but as a viewer, it's not very much fun to watch.  Ninotchka is a special Soviet agent, sent to Paris to check on three Soviet agents sent there to sell the former jewels of a Russian duchess. She arrives, and the men are surprised that Razinin (Bela Lugosi) sent a "female comrade." She tells them not to see her womanhood, and she clearly tries to see herself simply as a "comrade," not as a woman.  Nevertheless, Leon (Melvyn Douglass) immediately becomes attracted to her. He's close with the duchess, but neither he nor the duchess believe in love. Later he suggests to the duchess that he always thought love was "too middle class....