The Writer's Poke

Last week, I watched Original Sin (2001, Antonio Banduras and Angelina Jolie). Going into the film, I was completely clueless that it was a remake of Mississippi Mermaid (1969), and I'm guessing many or most viewers of Original Sin would likewise be surprised to learn about the original. I only happened to see one user review mention Mississippi Mermaid in its review of Original Sin, and it made me curious. Even that review was a little incomplete, as it didn't mention that this film was written and directed by legendary film director François Truffaut. To me, it was almost like watching a remake of a film originally done by Hitchcock, without somehow knowing that Hitchcock did the film first... (I should point out, sometimes it happens the other way. For example, I just watch The War of the Roses, 1989, not even knowing that the remake, The Roses, came out in 2025. Do I plan to see The Roses? I may, but not anytime soon.) Mississippi Mermaid starts off with multiple voiceovers...

Nancy M. Pimental wrote this one. From 1998-2001, she was a staff writer on South Park, which kind of gives you a sense of the humor likely to be used in this movie. She's also credited with writing 25 episodes of Shameless (TV series with 134 episodes, 2011-2021 and a current IMDb rating of 8.5). I include this because it would be so easy to write-off The Sweetest Thing as juvenile and stupid. And yes, it probably is juvenile and stupid, but in a Harold and Kumar (2004) way. That's the film that immediately came to mind as I started watching this. And yet, Sweetest Thing has a 5.2 IMDb rating, and Harold and Kumar has a 7.0 IMDb rating. I don't think that's fair. Is it just because this film features women being crude, whereas we're more accepting of crudeness from men? Roger Ebert, for example, rated Sweetest Thing a Thumbs Down (1.5/4 stars). In his assessment, he admitted that he loved watching the three female leads, admiring how committed and into their roles ...

Will Ferrell is not the most subtle or understated actor out there, but the movie does have nice attention to small details, and I can appreciate the "craftsmanship" of his writing. One of my favorite scenes is when Ron and his crew are attacked "Guys and Dolls" style by the #2 news team. That would have been a good scene, but then the #3 news team shows up. Then the PBS news team. Then the Spanish news team. It's that kind of thing that makes this film a little better than average for me. Another scene that I liked is when Ron's dog survives the dropkick attack from the motorcyclist Ron hits with a burrito (Jack Black). We see the dog again as Ron and Veronica are trapped in the Bear exhibit at the San Diego Zoo. It's the dog who is able to communicate with the bears, securing their release. The dog's dialogue is pure Will Ferrell. I haven't watched any other Will Ferrell films. At least not on purpose. When he was on SNL, I was a big fan. Certa...

Dan Castellaneta is the actor who plays Homer Simpson. But in this movie, all he does is sit in Gavin's (Danny DeVito) office and listen to the story of what happened to Barbara and Oliver Rose (Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas). Gavin is a divorce lawyer; he works at the same firm Oliver worked at. To be honest, Oliver and Barbara look like they have an okay marriage. Oliver might be a little condescending and controlling, but Barbara seems used to that. She's found a house that she's proud of making their own. She's started her own business. Everything might go along just fine. After all, they've been married for at least 17 years. But when Oliver has what at first seems to be a heart attack, Barbara initially starts for the hospital but stops when she realizes that she's no longer in love with her husband. She actually hopes he will die. This reminded me of something that Kate Chopin might write -- the classic "The Story of an Hour" moment, when ...

In the sequel to Romancing the Stone, we start off on a ship. No attempt at realism here. Definitely on a Sound Stage. Jack (Michael Douglas) and Joan (Kathleen Turner) are fighting off pirates that for some reason look straight out of Mad Max.  Then cut to "reality." Joan and Jack are actually living it up on a yacht. In the last movie, they had planned a romantic year of sailing around the world. And here they are, off the coast of the French Riveria, six months into the trip. She's typing her latest novel, but this time, instead of thinking her "pure cheese" writing is good, she recognizes just how horrible it is, and throws her typewriter overboard. It seems like an ill omen for the sequel, as what was lauded and applauded in the first movie might now be seen with sober clarity in the sequel. The stuff she writes is shite, and maybe it's also the movie admitting its store is shite.   The sequel was rushed into production after the original film did bette...

This is the first in a trio of films with Michael Douglas, Kathleen Turner, and Danny DeVito -- the other two being The Jewel of the Nile (1985) and The War of the Roses (1989). The movie opens in the American West, and the story is pure cheese. Cut to Joan Wilder (Turner) sitting at her typewriter. She's a romance novelist, and she's just finished her latest novel. She's pleased with the way it came together at the end. Based on the opening sequence, are we then supposed to excuse the movie itself for being pure cheese? My thought being: This is a framing device, and starting off with one of Joan Wilder's romance novels makes little sense, unless we're being prepared for the movie itself as being another one of her romance novels. Maybe one that "really happened" to her, but one that she will then fictionalize and write as a romance novel. As I watched it, I thought: The quality of the script and the filming is on par with the 1980s TV show The A-Team... ...