Skip to main content

Death of Language -- Writer's Poke #207

The English language contains far more words than necessary. All told, there are between 500,000 and 1 million words in the English language.

How many words does the average college-educated speaker of English know? Perhaps 20,000, or 2-4%.

Now brace yourself: How many words does the average college-educated person use on a regular weekly basis? Maybe 2,000.

Around 7,000 languages are still spoken around the world today, although roughly half are expected to go extinct by century's end.

The Tower of Babel crumbles. But the full potential of English certainly has yet to be realized.

Is the universalization of English a bad thing? Should languages be protected like other "endangered species"?

"Language shapes the way we think, and determines what we can think about." -- Benjamin Lee Whorf

Comments

  1. I wonder how you will be affected when your precious daughter uses some of the language that my generation considered crude and not suitable for polite conversation. Will what is called the F word bother you? How about the so called N word? Is one of those more or less objectionable than the other or are both acceptable for children to use? If acceptable for educated adults, then does that make them acceptable for children? I'd like to see you questioning and considering those questions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Um, I think children quickly learn when using certain words is and isn't appropriate. People often "code shift" depending on the context that they find themselves in. Honestly, if O said certain words in the private, I probably won't care. But at a very young age, it would be difficult for her to know when other people might be offended, or that it might not be "a good idea" for her to say the F-word in preschool...

    As someone that studies and appreciates language, however, I like to think words are just words. Words, of course, are not just words. They have connotations and emotions and "baggage" attached. I understand that, too. But I think a lot of people get overly concerned about things that don't really matter too much. Nothing should empower a word to be "crude" or "objectionable" in and of itself. That's a silly (and quaint) way of thinking... IMHO

    ReplyDelete
  3. I totally agree with your honest opinion. However we live in a silly and quaint world to some extent. Not the least silly is the concept that we must use words for comedy or for shock or something that we know if used on prime time television would be bleeped. (As if those watching would not know what was said)

    I was really more interested in the "N" word, however, than in the "F" word.

    I once told a "Pollack" joke in the presence of a man whom I admired. He quietly said, "I am Polish". I think I never again told a "Pollack" joke. How much does it cost to be sensitive to the sensitivities of others?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #2 -- Bald and Bankrupt

His first name is Benjamin, but he usually goes by "Bald." Bald has been posting travel videos since 2018. His passion is anything Soviet Union, but he will take the time to learn a language before he visits a place -- not only Russian, but Spanish, say. It's important for him to have the ability to speak to people in their native tongue.  On Friday, April 18, Bald posted a video called "Solo on Ukraine's Eastern Front." So far it's generated 2.7 million views, and based on viewer average, it will likely go over 5 million views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3HRnwC6pso Most of his videos are in the neighborhood of an hour in length. In them, he usually establishes where he is and what his goal for being there is. He will start somewhere and then go seek out a place, without knowing exactly what he will find there.  For the latest Ukraine video, he starts at the Kiev train station. It's been 3 years, he says, since he last visited Ukraine, and he h...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...