Skip to main content

The Deaths of Yue Yue and a Dictator -- Writer's Poke #330




A little girl escaped the watchful eyes of her mother, and ended up on the narrow streets of a big city. In the distance, a white van approached. The driver wasn’t going very fast – maybe just 20 miles an hour, but he apparently didn’t see the toddler, and the toddler definitely never noticed the van. And then in a moment, it happened. The van ran over the little girl.


The driver knew that something was wrong. Maybe he noticed at the moment of impact that he was running over a small child. But after pausing for two seconds, he decided to drive on. This decision required that the back tires of the van would run over the girl, and as the van drove off, a smear of blood trailed off into the distance.

Although no one saw this event happen, a security camera captured it on video for the world to see. And, it captured the aftermath. Within seconds a man walked down the street. When he came across the girl, he didn’t even bother to look down. He simply altered his path, walked around her body, and continued on his way. Other people came upon her body. Some stopped to look at her. No, she clearly wasn’t dead, but no one stopped to try to help.

Another van came down the street. It didn’t stop. The street was so narrow that it couldn’t avoid running over her legs. This van, like the last one, wasn’t driving more than 20 miles per hour, but this driver, unlike the first, never bothered to pause.

Finally, a trash worker noticed the body of the girl, and she attempted to move the body. At this point, maybe a few minutes had passed from the initial hit-and-run, and the girl was more or less lifeless. The trash worker was able to locate the mother, and the mother quickly scooped up her daughter and rushed her to the hospital. She was soon declared brain dead.

This event happened in China, but it could have occurred in Chicago, or anywhere in the world. People claim that human life has value, and yet when confronted with a situation that puts their own lives at an inconvenience, how many of us value our convenience over the value of another person’s life?

Certainly this little girl was “innocent,” but consider that in another part of the world, the dictator of Libya was being shot and beaten to death around the same moment. No one would claim he was an “innocent victim,” but is it right for people to cheer and claim “this is the day we’ve been waiting for”? In his case, people judged his life had no value. Does that make them any different from the people that judged the toddler’s life in China had no value? We assume that the little girl had potential and deserved a future, and yet most of us probably deny the same assumption to the Libyan dictator. And what about the people connected to both deaths? How do we feel about their potential?

What gives a human life value?

“The notion that human life is sacred just because it is human life is medieval.” – Peter Singer




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...