Skip to main content

Earth's Finest -- Writer's Poke #412



Try to think in terms of millions of years. I dare you. People simply aren’t made to think in such quantities. A million times around the Sun? What does that even mean? 

Jellyfish are the ultimate Earthlings. After all, they’ve been on this planet longer than just about anything. We know that jellyfish were around 500 million years ago (!). Homo sapiens? Maybe 100,000 years. Even fish, which we sometimes imagine started the whole evolution thing when they developed stubby little legs and crawled out onto dry land, gasping for breath, have only been around for 370 million years. 

But how have the jellies managed to do it? We think that big brains matter, that they are the secret to our planetary dominance. Jellies don’t think. They never developed the brains. If you’ve ever been to an aquarium, you probably noticed that they don’t seem to do much of anything. They simply exist, pulsating through the water, without any discernible purpose. 

And yet in a doom and gloom future, when the oceans are otherwise lifeless and empty, jellies will exist. They can exist in the most polluted conditions, the most acidic of circumstances. Global warming? They’ll just be getting warmed up, so to speak. 

Scientists theorize that the planet has gone through five mass extinction events in the last 440 million years. Some suggest we might be on the verge of a sixth. Odds are the jellies will survive; will we?

Are human beings superior to jelly fish, or does such a question even make sense?

“Those who admire the massive, rigid bone structures of dinosaurs should remember that jellyfish still enjoy their very secure ecological niche.” – Beau Shiel

Comments

  1. I really like the way you started by saying that humans are not made to think in terms of millions of years. But then you say that we "know" that jellyfish were around 500 million years ago. Really? How do you or I really "know" any such thing? I can accept that there are those who know that there is evidence that they interpret to mean that there were creatures much like what we know as jellyfish on earth 500 millions of years ago. But do we really know that the evidence is true (or false)?

    Now, based on what you are saying, may I ask, "Does it really matter whether or not we continue to exist as a mortal race on this old "oblate spheroid"?

    I am not asking for any discussion. I am seeking to deepen the thought.

    I am not critical of the question or of the discussion thus far, but I see other questions that beg to be asked. Science may not ask them. Philosophy, it seems to me, must.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BTW, yes, the question does deserve to be asked. A simple answer, I think, is, "Yes, a jellyfish is superior to a human for the 'niche' it fills in the tapestry of life on earth."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...