A Civil War rages on in Syria. Meanwhile, over the weekend, the Golden
Globes (sponsors by the Hollywood foreign press) rolled out the red carpet to celebrate the hard work of American actors and actresses, who, for the most part, tell fictional stories for a living.
On my facebook feed, The Onion posted this headline: “The 6 Best Dresses at the Golden
Globes.” So, yes, I clicked on it, only to find, without any explanation
whatsoever, six pictures from the war in Syria. The caption to each picture was
apparently real, but taken from a red carpet picture.
The juxtaposition of the images and the captions
was, well, quite effective.
I’m not sure how The
Onion got its name, but when I think of an onion, I think of something
which is multi-layered -- something that tastes good on hamburgers. I also think of
something which makes you cry when you cut into it, and makes your breath stink
when you eat it.
All in all, a perfect name for a satirical paper.
If you’re like most Americans, over the past couple of days, you probably at least
noticed some of the dresses worn by Hollywood’s top females. But when was the
last time you took notice of the images coming out of Syria? Why do we have to be tricked into pay attention?
What makes satire (The Onion, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, etc.,) so effective?
Why are Americans apparently willing to get “real news” from satirical sources,
but are not willing to pay attention to “serious news” from traditional
sources?
“In times like
these it is difficult not to write satire.” – Juvenal
p.s. Just this
morning, I read that a bomb hit a school in Syria while students were taking final exams, killing
eighty. Should we feel comfortable in America celebrating and watching movies while parts
of the world burn?
Comments
Post a Comment