Skip to main content

Cat-astrophe in China -- Writer's Poke #394


A semi carrying a payload of hundreds of cats crashed on a Chinese highway. These cats, worth a dollar or two a piece, were on their way to the slaughterhouse. Because, even though it’s taboo to eat cats in China, millions of cats end up being served for human consumption annually. This certainly brings a whole new meaning to “eating Chinese,” doesn’t it?

In the U.S., most of us are pretty boring when it comes to the meat we will eat. Most of us stick to chicken and beef and pork. Maybe a few of us restrict our pork intake for religious reasons, and a few of us don’t eat meat at all for personal or ethical reasons. But for those of us that do eat meat, the idea of eating cat probably never crosses our minds. When is the last time you thought, “Man, I’d really like some barbeque cat for dinner tonight?”

What we consider proper to eat is, at least to a great extent, a matter of tradition and culture. Is there anything wrong with eating cats? Although the cats might not like it, there is not anything “wrong” from the meat-eaters’ point of view. After all, cats are meat, and if we are meat-eaters, why shouldn’t we eat a cat now and then?

And who knows? Cat might be very tasty. How do we know if we never try a sample? After all, don’t we tell our kids, “Try it, you might like it”?

Would you be willing to at least try a sample of cat-meat stew? Why or why not?

“I love cats” – Dick Van Patten

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #2 -- Bald and Bankrupt

His first name is Benjamin, but he usually goes by "Bald." Bald has been posting travel videos since 2018. His passion is anything Soviet Union, but he will take the time to learn a language before he visits a place -- not only Russian, but Spanish, say. It's important for him to have the ability to speak to people in their native tongue.  On Friday, April 18, Bald posted a video called "Solo on Ukraine's Eastern Front." So far it's generated 2.7 million views, and based on viewer average, it will likely go over 5 million views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3HRnwC6pso Most of his videos are in the neighborhood of an hour in length. In them, he usually establishes where he is and what his goal for being there is. He will start somewhere and then go seek out a place, without knowing exactly what he will find there.  For the latest Ukraine video, he starts at the Kiev train station. It's been 3 years, he says, since he last visited Ukraine, and he h...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...