Skip to main content

The Evolution of Belief -- Writer's Poke #397






When surveyed, most Americans still say that they do not believe in evolution. Is “believe” the right word? For example, the Baltimore Ravens defeated the New England Patriots on Sunday. What sense would it make to ask people if they believed the Ravens won? I suppose people could choose not to believe it, if they wished, but it wouldn’t make a lot of sense, right?

When presented with the evidence, you are obligated to reach a conclusion. Your analysis of the evidence might help you form a “belief,” but “belief” is often used in a looser sense – such as “a feeling I have.” 

People’s views on evolution, often times, develop from feelings rather than from any examination of the evidence. How many Americans actually sit down and study the theories of evolution? Not many, I bet. Why not? Perhaps because scientific inquiry requires some effort, and there’s not always a lot of direct payoff. If I’m not an evolutionary biologist, why do I need to study evolution anyway? 

But somehow, even people who are not football fans will admit that the Baltimore Ravens are going to the Super Bowl. People often say that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but what would it mean to allow someone to believe that the New England Patriots won and are going to the Super Bowl? Pretty silly, right?

Granted, the validity of evolution isn’t the same thing as the outcome of a football game. On the other hand, should people who haven’t been studying the results be called upon to voice their views about the results? It might seem silly to make a big deal about it, but some people who do not believe in evolution are voted into positions of power by American citizens who do not believe in evolution. These powerful people then make policy decisions about scientific issues. And that, I would suggest, is scary, because it is like they are making assumptions about the final score of the game without having watched the game.

Yes, I thought the New England Patriots were going to win that game, too, but once I learned that they didn’t, I didn’t continue to hold to the belief that they did.

What helps a theory to evolve?

“Evolution is not a force but a process. Not a cause but a law.” – John Morley

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...