Skip to main content

The Evolution of Belief -- Writer's Poke #397






When surveyed, most Americans still say that they do not believe in evolution. Is “believe” the right word? For example, the Baltimore Ravens defeated the New England Patriots on Sunday. What sense would it make to ask people if they believed the Ravens won? I suppose people could choose not to believe it, if they wished, but it wouldn’t make a lot of sense, right?

When presented with the evidence, you are obligated to reach a conclusion. Your analysis of the evidence might help you form a “belief,” but “belief” is often used in a looser sense – such as “a feeling I have.” 

People’s views on evolution, often times, develop from feelings rather than from any examination of the evidence. How many Americans actually sit down and study the theories of evolution? Not many, I bet. Why not? Perhaps because scientific inquiry requires some effort, and there’s not always a lot of direct payoff. If I’m not an evolutionary biologist, why do I need to study evolution anyway? 

But somehow, even people who are not football fans will admit that the Baltimore Ravens are going to the Super Bowl. People often say that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but what would it mean to allow someone to believe that the New England Patriots won and are going to the Super Bowl? Pretty silly, right?

Granted, the validity of evolution isn’t the same thing as the outcome of a football game. On the other hand, should people who haven’t been studying the results be called upon to voice their views about the results? It might seem silly to make a big deal about it, but some people who do not believe in evolution are voted into positions of power by American citizens who do not believe in evolution. These powerful people then make policy decisions about scientific issues. And that, I would suggest, is scary, because it is like they are making assumptions about the final score of the game without having watched the game.

Yes, I thought the New England Patriots were going to win that game, too, but once I learned that they didn’t, I didn’t continue to hold to the belief that they did.

What helps a theory to evolve?

“Evolution is not a force but a process. Not a cause but a law.” – John Morley

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #2 -- Bald and Bankrupt

His first name is Benjamin, but he usually goes by "Bald." Bald has been posting travel videos since 2018. His passion is anything Soviet Union, but he will take the time to learn a language before he visits a place -- not only Russian, but Spanish, say. It's important for him to have the ability to speak to people in their native tongue.  On Friday, April 18, Bald posted a video called "Solo on Ukraine's Eastern Front." So far it's generated 2.7 million views, and based on viewer average, it will likely go over 5 million views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3HRnwC6pso Most of his videos are in the neighborhood of an hour in length. In them, he usually establishes where he is and what his goal for being there is. He will start somewhere and then go seek out a place, without knowing exactly what he will find there.  For the latest Ukraine video, he starts at the Kiev train station. It's been 3 years, he says, since he last visited Ukraine, and he h...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...