Skip to main content

Marriage Story (2019)



The movie starts with a montage sequence, with both Charlie (Adam Driver) and Nicolle (Scarlett Johansson) telling what they like and appreciate about each other. This seems really cute, until it becomes obvious that there must be a reason that they are saying nice things about one another, and then the film cuts to the couple sitting in a room with a therapist (Robert Smigel). In other words, this was all just an exercise assigned to them by their marriage counselor, with the expressed purpose of reminding them that, at least once upon a time, they liked -- maybe even loved -- one another. And maybe they still do, because all of the stuff they mention is nice, and it remains to be seen why they are at a marriage counselor, or what secrets they're hiding that they didn't want to write down on notebook paper at the shrink's request.


Wrong. They aren't at a marriage counselor at all. They are at a mediator, preparing for a separation and amicable(?) divorce. They've written down all these nice things, but Nicolle decides that she doesn't want to read it out loud, and so neither of them hear what the other has said. Only the viewers get to know what they apparently really think about one another.

And so... what went wrong in the marriage? They have an eight-year-old son that they both love, and we guess that their marriage has gone about ten years. If they have a problem with their marriage, it's that they cannot communicate what's been communicated in the opening montage, and they leave a lot of other things unsaid. Both are selfish and easily hurt. And when the film begins, Nicolle has simply decided that she no longer wants to be married. Maybe Charlie feels the same way, but the burden of what's happening to them (e.g. the painful process of divorce) seems to be Nicolle's doing.

What does she want? She wants to be more than a mom and "second" to Charlie. She's from L.A. and feels like she's given up her identity and career to play second-fiddle to Charlie in New York. It's obvious that she's not as happy being in New York as Charlie is. He's driven and probably blind to her needs. He's the director, and he's "directed" everything about their marriage to suit his needs and preferences.

I wouldn't call this film a comedy, although it probably is meant to be -- because so much of it is awkward and lowkey funny. At first, I hate Nicolle's character and find myself siding with Charlie, but Charlie is equally annoying and hard to like. One wishes that the divorce didn't have to happen, because, yes, they probably do still love each other "even if it no longer makes sense," but what exactly does that mean? Could they really not find a way to stay married, both pursue the things they wanted to do with their careers, and avoid such a seemingly avoidable yearlong trauma?

Noah Baumbach is a great writer and an equally good director. And the film has a great supporting cast -- Alan Alda, Ray Liotta, Wallace Shawn, etc. I appreciate how the scenes are laid out and how some of them develop fortwo, three, four or more minutes without a cut. It's very smartly done.

In terms of plot, you wonder if they will somehow end up not getting divorced, if this will be something they "figure out" before the divorce goes through, but this film is too sophisticated for that. What I like is that eventually Charlie will get to hear Nicolle's accolades about him. And in the final scene, the true healing process has begun. Charlie and Nicolle are no longer married, but they've both grown up and matured, and they understand each other a lot better. They will still be able to raise their son together. They have found a way to maintain a relationship, albeit a coparenting/friendship in place of a marriage.

Rating: 5/5

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #1 - Real Coffee with Scott Adams

I've been curious about how others perceive reality. What is "true" and "real" to me is not necessarily "true" and "real" to others.  First stop: Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert.  He's currently 67, does a daily podcast called "Real Coffee with Scott Adams" which draws about 30,000 listeners on YouTube, with 172,000 total subscribers to the channel. Podcast is also available on all the usual places, with a 4.4 rating on Apple Podcasts. Each episode is about an hour long, or a little less.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15SFbr2vj8c 1. Basic format: Just runs through news articles that drew his interest. On the April 15 episode (link above), he ran through 28 articles. Often he'd laugh at something, sometimes to show his disbelief.  2. Adams is not a big fan of science. He's open to conspiracy theories. Believes that the government doesn't tell us the truth (although he seems to think the Trump administration is an e...