The messaging of movies. It's not always something you think about, but sometimes it's easy to see when you watch older films. In this one, both the boyfriend and the father give the message: The way for women to be happy is to marry, have kids, and take care of the house. That's it. That's the secret to being content and to being truly happy. There are no alternatives.
As the title suggests, the focus is on the girl, Jean (Elizabeth Taylor). She has a boyfriend who loves her and wants to marry her, Vance (Gig Court). He's rich and she's rich. They want for nothing, and yet, even though she loves him, she's worried about settling down. She wants to see what else life has to offer. That's funny to me. She's going to have servants, and she will have the money to do whatever she wants. That's never addressed in the film. There's nothing that marriage will limit her from experiencing, except other men.
Does she want to sow her wild oats? It's a 1950s film, so this is heavily implied, but not stated, and it doesn't seem like she's against being instantly married. After all, while she tells Vance that she needs time, she immediately latches on to Victor (Fernado Lamas). Is that a plot flaw? Maybe he is "the One" in her mind, but she's still going to immediately marry him and not find out what else is out there? And even with Victor, her dreams are to settle down and live in Lexington. That's the world she knows, and she's happy and content there.
Victor, too, gets the short end of the stick. He legit wants to change for her. He's willing to retire and live in Lexington. The only reason that doesn't happen, Jean's dad, Steve (William Powell). He won't give Victor a second chance, which starts the dominoes falling against Victor. It's not really Victor's fault. Are we really not supposed to feel sorry for Victor? Whatever he did in the past, who cares? He's been good and seemingly true to Jean.
Jean has skeleton's too, but it's apparently caused by her mom dying early. Has she gone too far with boys? Does she always seek out the bad boy? Maybe that's the original attraction to Victtor, but the movie allows her to change, and not him? Why is that fair? By the way, why does she call her dad by his first name? Never explained.
By the end of the short movie -- very concisely told -- Vance is completely gone. He had said he would not be around to save her, but his absence feels odd. Would he really not be there to pick her up after Victor's exit? If Jean is now submitting to settling down and living the true woman's life, why wouldn't she crawl back to Vance? I'm also wondering about Steve. He knows a lot about Victor for years. Why was it ethical for him to work for him as his lawyer all that time?
Is this supposed to be a remake of A Free Soul (1931) -- Norma Shearer, Clark Gable? The plot is slightly different, but basically the same concept of a woman falling for the wrong man and then fortunately escaping the consequences.

Comments
Post a Comment