Another thing to point out -- Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine are just a couple years apart in age. I think Welles is 28, which is a shockingly young Rochester -- I just watched the George C. Scott version, and Scott was at least 15 years older when played Rochester.
Joan Fontaine, on the other hand, is a little too old -- maybe 26 -- to be playing the part of Jane Eyre, and she's also way too pretty... probably the best-looking Jane Eyre of all the various actresses who have played Jane Eyre.. and although Jane Eyre is supposed to be horribly plain, no version casts a plain actress. But in what universe is Joan Fontaine plain?
Overall, I like this version when it goes goth and works the black and white vibe. Unfortunately, the layout of the plot feels pretty paint by numbers. I didn't hate any of it, but nothing much stands out to me. Even Helen Burns. That's a young Elizabeth Taylor. I knew that, but had forgotten, and I had to go back and re-watch her scenes to notice. Taylor does stand out. Even at a young age, she had those eyes.
The whole subplot with St. John is cut, which isn't that big of a deal, but yeah, I was looking for more to wow me, especially since this is now about 6th or 7th version I've watched this year... just a pretty run-on-the mill adaptation.
Rating: 2.5/5

Comments
Post a Comment