Why? I guess I thought George C. Scott was a real stretch to play Rochester, especially since this film came right after his portrayal of Patton, and I had a hard time imaging Patton playing Rochester. In addition to that, although I'm not familiar with Susannah York, I knew she was in her 30s, and Jane Eyre should be played by someone a decade younger.
But I started watching, and the movie won me over. In fact, I was generally pleasantly surprised with the acting, the pacing, and the setting. Everything "clicked" for me.
After reading various reviews, I learned that the video quality would probably stink, and that was certainly the case for the DVD version I bought. The color was very inconsistent, and I'm sure the film would look very different if anyone cared to do a restoration of make a quality copy. I'm assuming the film is public domain and other than the freaks like me that are watching every available version, there's not a big demand for a 1970 version of Jane Eyre.
In a funny way, though, I also thought that the poor quality of the video "worked," somehow making the film feel more real, or at least psychologically, more "historic."
Rating: 4/5 stars

Comments
Post a Comment