Although this isn't a silent picture, it acts like one.
I even found myself saying, "Gee, I like a movie that reads like a book." Not just because it has the place cards like a silent film, but because it has characters reading from a book. Maybe 5 or 6 times we stop and read a page out of the vampire book with the characters.
Maybe this was groundbreaking information -- Who the Vampires work for, what powers they have, how to kill them, etc. -- but reading a page of text on the screen is not the best way to use the film media.
So, if you're not really into slow, 1930s pictures that don't know if they want to be silent, and don't know how to "show" more than they "tell," I wouldn't recommend this one.
As one reviewer noted, it has absolutely no action. You will barely see a vampire. You will hardly see any blood. At one point, you will see a woman give a creepy smile. That's the extent of it.
And I would be okay with that, but I really don't see the psychology. I'm not connected to Allan Grey (Julian West) whatsoever. What's his deal? If a weird old man enters your room and leaves you a package, do you just stay frozen in your bed? Why didn't he want Allan to open the package (the vampire book) until after he died? Why did he give it to Allan in the first place?
Who the heck is this Allan?
And is the doctor (Jan Hieronimko) a bad guy? A victim? I'm sure I will watch the supplemental materials included with the Criterion Collection DVD and learn everything I couldn't figure out on a first watch, but much of the story is opaque and just not that captivating as a result.
In terms of the special effects, I do appreciate the early 1930s special effects -- the overlay of a face, the use of reversing the camera, the walking shadows. That's all pretty cool, and ultimately what raises my rating to 2.5 stars.
Rating: 2.5/5 stars

Comments
Post a Comment