Skip to main content

Spider-Man 2 (2004)


Sometimes you re-watch a movie and think, "That one holds up." It's a weird idea: That something can be "good" at the time but maybe less good later. Can a movie really depreciate over time, like a car? Is it normal for movie depreciation to happen, and what causes it to happen?

In the case of Spider-Man 2, for example, it's the second movie in the first Spider-Man franchise. A 2026-viewer will naturally compare the movies from the first franchise against the movies from the second and third Spider-Man franchises. Any viewer will also compare a sequel or the continuation of the story against the movie that came before it. 

When I was re-watching Spider-Man 2, I found myself more interested in assessing it against Spider-Man (2002), a movie that I had some questions about -- one being: Why are Harry (James Franco) and Peter (Tobey Maguire) friends? Unfortunately, Spider-Man 2 simply assumes they are. It does nothing to strengthen the case. Peter is still working his way through college, but what's happened to Harry? Has he taken over Oscorp? Maybe he's not exactly the head, but they don't explain his involvement in the company, and they don't explain if Harry finished college, or if college doesn't matter because he inherited all of his father's money. At least in the first movie Harry and Peter were roommates, but if they're no longer roommates and no longer going to the same school. is it likely that they are best friends, or even "better friends" than they were before?

I have the same question about Peter and Mary Jane (Kristen Durst): Why are they "best friends"? In Spider-Man, Peter tells her that a friend is all he can be to her, but that should probably kill not only their potential dating relationship, but also their friend status. In Spider-Man 2, they are both living busy lives, and Mary Jane is even serious enough about a guy that she's ready to marry him. If Peter was a best friend, it seems logical that they would have talked about her getting serious with this other guy before the point when she actually tells Peter she's getting married. 

Part of the reason I don't like this movie is because I find it too melodramatic. It relies too much on these key relationships, and it never takes any opportunity to develop them.

I'm also not always a fan of how every time we see Peter and Mary Jane talking, each seems to have a flashlight shown in their face. The lighting is just a little heavy. 

Doc Ock (Alfred Molina) is a fun villain, and I like how all the Spider-Man villains seem to be split into good and bad parts, just like how Peter is split in two parts -- not necessarily "good" and "bad," but when we see Peter ignore a mugging, I guess you could still say his "bad" side was in control. 

So, does this movie hold up? I don't know. It's definitely not as good as I remembered it being, but maybe it never was as good as I remembered it being. Keep in mind that Spider-Man 2 came out before Marvel started releasing 2 or 3 superhero movies every year. It probably felt more special back in 2004 simply because the superhero movie landscape hadn't been saturated with superhero movies. Part of me does feel that I'm being a little harsh assessing it as 3 out of 5 stars, but I liked it less than Spider-Man, and so I couldn't justify rating it any higher, which scares me as I don't recall thinking Spider-Man 3 was better than Spider-Man 2... We'll see how I feel after the re-watch.

Rating: 3/5 stars

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Digging for the Truth" Experiment #4 -- The Federalist Radio Hour

I first heard of Sean Davis last week. He created an online magazine called The Federalist in 2011, and he currently has about 500,000 followers on X.  It was about last week that he posted something amazing. He suggested if the Supreme Court doesn't rule the way they should, not only should Trump just ignore the ruling, if they keep obstructing the administration, he should just dissolve the Court altogether.  And I thought, wow. This guy is saying outrageous stuff like that, and there's an audience for it.  So, I decided I'd listen to an episode of The Federalist podcast: April 17, 2025 -- Deportation, Due Process, and Deference to the American People (40 minutes) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/deportation-due-process-and-deference-to-the/id983782306?i=1000703904873 In the 40-minute conversation, the host and guest discussed why due process wasn't required for illegal immigrants.  The case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was mentioned for a brief second, but...

In Utero

  In 1994, I wore my In Utero shirt to college. I’d walk down the hall, and people would look at the shirt. I still remember a professor looking at it, not apparently hip to the scene. She asked, “Bret, is there something you’re trying to tell us?” I had no idea what I was trying to say. Kurt Cobain had just shot his head off with a shotgun. Before that life-changing event, I hadn’t been the biggest fan of Nirvana, but I did recognize the immediate impact “Smells Like Teen Spirit” had on music, or at least on MTV. Nirvana had seemingly killed and buried Hair Metal, and they had done it single-handedly. What exactly was this “Alternative” sound? It was weird, because soon it felt like everything was “alternative,” and that didn’t make any sense. Once everything is the same, how can it be anything but standard, normal? Nirvana was okay, but at least at the time I was wearing the merch, I was much more into Offspring and Green Day and Tool. And that’s about as far as I went into...

I Must Betray You -- Ruta Sepetys

I appreciate the pacing. The author's epilogue includes her mission statement -- historical fiction as a way to keep history alive. Romanis is an obscure place, but she hopes people reading the book will take an interest in its history.  She also makes the point that there are no clean endings. So, the evil dictator and his wife were killed, but the problems they created didn't magically go away, the country still had to find its way and move forward, and it was a process.